|
HHS Announces Actions to Protect Consumers and Lower Health Care Costs
|
|
07/07/2023
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 7, 2023
Contact: CMS Media Relations
CMS Media Inquiries
HHS Announces Actions to Protect Consumers and Lower Health Care Costs
New Report Projects Nearly 19 Million Seniors Will Save $400 Per Year on Out-of-Pocket Prescription Drug Costs
Today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announced actions to protect consumers from junk health plans, surprise medical bills, and excess costs that lead to medical
debt. These actions build on the Biden-Harris Administration’s effort to eliminate hidden fees in every sector of the economy and lower health care costs for American seniors and families.
Coinciding with the actions taken today, HHS also released a new report projecting that nearly 19 million seniors will save approximately $400 per year on prescription drug costs when
the $2,000 out-of-pocket prescription drug spending cap from the Inflation Reduction Act – President Biden’s historic lower cost prescription drug law – goes into effect in 2025.
The report follows last week’s actions advancing historic provisions in the law that allow Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices and cap the cost of each Medicare-covered insulin
pump at $35 per month.
“The Biden-Harris Administration continues to take action to lower costs for millions of Americans and improve health outcomes across the nation. Today’s announcement protects patients
from junk health insurance and unfair billing practices, and increases transparency in our health care system, while continuing to implement President Biden’s historic prescription drug law that is lowering costs for millions of seniors across the country,”
said HHS
Secretary Xavier Becerra. “The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to helping seniors and people with disabilities save money on the medications they need and ensuring hardworking
families have insurance when they need it.”
“The Biden-Harris Administration’s efforts to make health care more affordable are life-
changing for millions of Americans,” said Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure. “No one should go bankrupt trying to get and keep themself
or their family healthy. CMS is committed to a more transparent, fair, and accountable health system for the people we serve. We will continue to clarify consumer rights under the No Surprises Act, work to better understand the impact of medical debt, and
limit non-comprehensive junk insurance plans.”
Lowering the Price of Prescription Drugs
HHS released research today on lower out-of-pocket costs resulting from President Biden’s lower cost prescription drug law, which is already saving some seniors and people with disabilities
hundreds of dollars annually. According to a new Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), report, the law’s changes to the Medicare Part D program may reduce out-of-pocket spending by nearly $400 for more than 18.7 million enrollees
when the provisions are implemented in 2025, or about one in three people with Medicare Part D. Among this population, the report finds nearly 1.9 million enrollees are projected to save at least $1,000 in 2025. Once all of the provisions modeled in this report
are in effect in 2025, they collectively will result in about a $7.4 billion reduction in annual out-of-pocket spending. Today’s report also includes state-by-state projected savings for Medicare enrollees in 2024 and 2025.
Medicare Part D Enrollee Out-Of-Pocket Savings
Projected Impact of Inflation Reduction Act Medicare Part D Redesign for Enrollees Expected
to Have Out-Of-Pocket Savings in 2025, by State
|
State
|
Number of Enrollees with Out-of-Pocket Savings
|
Average Savings per Enrollee with Savings
|
Total
Estimated Out-of-Pocket Savings
|
|
Alabama
|
366,890
|
$359.73
|
$131,983,143
|
|
Alaska
|
30,520
|
$309.38
|
$9,442,237
|
|
Arizona
|
388,850
|
$379.35
|
$147,508,867
|
|
Arkansas
|
203,210
|
$341.84
|
$69,464,876
|
|
California
|
2,180,530
|
$295.51
|
$644,379,120
|
|
Colorado
|
220,050
|
$451.28
|
$99,304,666
|
|
Connecticut
|
255,900
|
$367.55
|
$94,055,573
|
|
Delaware
|
63,350
|
$448.51
|
$28,413,083
|
|
District of Columbia
|
33,190
|
$183.87
|
$6,102,580
|
|
Florida
|
1,479,230
|
$401.15
|
$593,397,513
|
|
Georgia
|
589,320
|
$394.96
|
$232,756,502
|
|
Hawaii
|
82,130
|
$280.75
|
$23,057,663
|
|
Idaho
|
82,160
|
$461.75
|
$37,937,117
|
|
Illinois
|
597,880
|
$432.70
|
$258,702,317
|
|
Indiana
|
385,650
|
$465.07
|
$179,352,376
|
|
Iowa
|
163,690
|
$524.51
|
$85,857,481
|
|
Kansas
|
129,630
|
$550.04
|
$71,301,576
|
|
Kentucky
|
333,560
|
$359.04
|
$119,760,791
|
|
Louisiana
|
327,110
|
$320.05
|
$104,692,595
|
|
Maine
|
126,850
|
$298.30
|
$37,839,589
|
|
Maryland
|
284,990
|
$387.91
|
$110,551,046
|
|
Massachusetts
|
481,730
|
$333.23
|
$160,525,210
|
|
Michigan
|
672,860
|
$356.00
|
$239,539,146
|
|
Minnesota
|
234,800
|
$483.22
|
$113,461,163
|
|
Mississippi
|
203,300
|
$364.26
|
$74,054,703
|
|
Missouri
|
348,280
|
$461.94
|
$160,886,006
|
|
Montana
|
54,010
|
$460.60
|
$24,877,143
|
|
Nebraska
|
88,600
|
$629.59
|
$55,781,343
|
|
Nevada
|
143,020
|
$433.81
|
$62,043,947
|
|
New Hampshire
|
72,960
|
$490.01
|
$35,751,168
|
|
New Jersey
|
473,370
|
$519.78
|
$246,047,780
|
|
New Mexico
|
125,870
|
$272.72
|
$34,327,699
|
|
New York
|
1,145,400
|
$389.63
|
$446,277,061
|
|
North Carolina
|
662,600
|
$405.85
|
$268,914,391
|
|
North Dakota
|
33,050
|
$505.87
|
$16,718,953
|
|
Ohio
|
687,430
|
$451.18
|
$310,154,676
|
|
Oklahoma
|
206,000
|
$452.25
|
$93,164,394
|
|
Oregon
|
224,100
|
$388.30
|
$87,017,149
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
829,770
|
$466.79
|
$387,330,525
|
|
Rhode Island
|
68,120
|
$339.62
|
$23,134,972
|
|
South Carolina
|
334,960
|
$434.55
|
$145,557,773
|
|
South Dakota
|
39,710
|
$586.73
|
$23,299,064
|
|
Tennessee
|
459,280
|
$417.36
|
$191,685,868
|
|
Texas
|
1,323,430
|
$399.64
|
$528,899,748
|
|
Utah
|
95,950
|
$490.54
|
$47,067,108
|
|
Vermont
|
44,030
|
$491.89
|
$21,658,034
|
|
Virginia
|
390,400
|
$440.62
|
$172,017,610
|
|
Washington
|
344,470
|
$412.96
|
$142,251,405
|
|
West Virginia
|
140,540
|
$346.26
|
$48,663,280
|
|
Wisconsin
|
298,750
|
$474.91
|
$141,879,088
|
|
Wyoming
|
21,920
|
$607.58
|
$13,318,138
|
|
Total*
|
18.7 million
|
$396.08
|
$7.4 billion
|
Source: ASPE Part D Simulation Model
* Totals include Medicare Part D enrollees residing in territories or areas outside the United States, who are not shown separately.
Protecting Consumers from Junk Plans
Today, HHS and the Departments of Labor and the Treasury issued proposed rules to empower and protect consumers through changes aimed at distinguishing short-term, limited-duration insurance
(STLDI) and fixed indemnity insurance (plans that pay a pre- determined fixed amount for a health-related event, regardless of expenses incurred) from comprehensive coverage. STLDI and fixed indemnity insurance sometimes include benefit limitations, and are
sold by employing dubious marketing practices, that render such coverage as nothing more than junk. These types of plans are not subject to many of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) critical consumer protections, which consumers might not
realize when purchasing them. As a result, individuals may unknowingly end up in plans that do not cover essential benefits like prescription drugs, exclude coverage for pre-existing
conditions, or impose annual or lifetime dollar limits on services. Such non-comprehensive coverage can be particularly harmful to low-income individuals and individuals with significant health care needs, as they would face the greatest health and financial
consequences from inadequate insurance coverage. The proposed rule, among other policies, would amend the federal definition of STLDI
to ensure these “short-term” plans are truly short-term and used to fill temporary gaps in comprehensive coverage. It would also require STLDI and fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage
to make clearer to consumers the differences between these products and comprehensive coverage, including what is covered and how much is covered.
Improving Transparency and Protections from Unexpected Out-of-Pocket Costs
The Departments also released a frequently asked questions (FAQs) document further clarifying surprise billing and out-of-pocket cost protections for consumers under the No Surprises
Act and the ACA, helping to ensure that consumers receive the appropriate protections under these laws. The FAQs also reiterate requirements for plans and issuers to make price information available to consumers, including information on facility fees.
Relatedly, HHS, through ASPE issued the first in a series of
reports to Congress on the
impact of the No Surprises Act, The report establishes a framework for evaluation of the law’s impact on surprise billing, health care costs, and consolidation that will be used in future reports evaluating the impact
of the law.
HHS has joined the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Department of the Treasury in issuing a Request for Information (RFI) seeking public comment on the prevalence, nature, and
impact of medical credit cards and other medical payment products on consumers and on the health care system. The agencies also seek comment on policy options to address practices by financial companies and health care providers offering these products that
result in consumers paying excess costs and that drive up medical debt. This is the first-ever collaboration among the three agencies on the needs of health care consumers.
A new White House fact sheet on actions to lower health care costs and protect consumers is available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/07/fact-sheetpresident-biden-announces-new-actions-to-lower-health-care-costs-and-protect-consumers-from-scam-insurance-plans-and-junk-fees-as-part-of-bidenomics-push/.
The proposed rule on short-term, limited-duration insurance (STLDI) is available at
https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2023-14238/short-term-limited-duration-insurance-independent-noncoordinated-excepted-benefits-coverage
and fact sheet is available https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/short-term-limited-duration-insurance-independent-noncoordinated-excepted-benefits-coverage-level
To read the No Surprises Act FAQs visit:
https://www.cms.gov/cciio/resources/fact-sheets-and-faqs#Affordable_Care_Act.
To read the ASPE report to Congress on the No Surprises Act visit:
https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/33f109709e630b54fe0b7ccef4cb62ad/aspe-no-surprises-act-rtc.pdf.
The tri-agency Request for Information on medical payment products is available at
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/.
###
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System: Remedy for the 340B-Acquired Drug Payment Policy for Calendar Years 2018-2022 Proposed Rule (CMS
1793-P)
|
|
07/07/2023
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 7, 2023
Contact: CMS Media Relations
(202) 690-6145 |
CMS Media Inquiries
Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System: Remedy for the 340B-Acquired Drug Payment Policy for Calendar Years 2018-2022 Proposed Rule (CMS 1793-P)
On July 7, 2023, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in
American Hospital Association v. Becerra
(142 S. Ct. 1896 (2022)) and the district court’s remand to the agency, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule outlining the proposed remedy for the 340B-acquired drug payment policy for Calendar Years 2018-2022.
CMS is publishing this proposed rule to remedy the payment rates the Court held were invalid. Aspects of this proposed policy will affect nearly all hospitals paid under the OPPS.
This proposed rule will have a 60-day comment period, which will end on September 5, 2023. This fact sheet discusses the provisions of the proposed rule (CMS- 1793-P), which can be downloaded
at
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/current.
CMS anticipates issuing the final rule before the Calendar Year (CY) 2024 Outpatient Prospective Payment System/Ambulatory Surgery Center (OPPS/ASC) final rule is published in Fall 2023.
Background
Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act (340B) allows participating hospitals and other providers to purchase certain covered outpatient drugs or biologicals (hereinafter referred
to collectively as “drugs”) from manufacturers at discounted prices. Prior to 2018, the Medicare payment rate for Part B covered outpatient drugs provided in outpatient hospitals was generally the statutory default of average sales price (ASP) plus 6%. In
the CY 2018 OPPS/ASC final rule that was finalized in 2017, CMS adjusted the payment rate for 340B drugs to ASP minus 22.5% to reflect more accurately the actual costs incurred by 340B hospitals when acquiring 340B drugs. This rate applied from CY 2018 through
approximately the third quarter of CY 2022. To comply with statutory budget neutrality requirements under the OPPS, CMS made a corresponding increase to payments to all hospitals (340B hospitals and non-340B hospitals) for non-drug items and services, which
was in effect from CY 2018 through CY 2022.
On June 15, 2022, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the differential payment rates for 340B-acquired drugs were unlawful because, prior to implementing the rates, HHS failed to
conduct a survey of hospitals’ acquisition costs under the relevant statute.
On September 28, 2022, the District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the differential payment rates for 340B-acquired drugs going forward. As a result, all CY 2022 claims for
340B-acquired drugs paid on or after September 28, 2022, were paid at the default rate (generally ASP plus 6%).
In the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rule, CMS finalized a general payment rate of ASP plus 6% for drugs acquired through the 340B Program, consistent with the agency’s policy for drugs not
acquired through the 340B program. As required by statute, CMS implemented a 3.09% reduction to the payment rates for non-drug items and services to achieve budget neutrality for the 340B drug payment rate change for CY 2023. This budget neutrality change
ensured the CY 2023 OPPS conversion factor was equivalent to the conversion factor that would have been in place had the 340B drug payment policy never been implemented.
In the CY 2023 OPPS/ASC final rule, CMS announced that it would address the remedy for 340B drug payments from CY 2018-2022 in future rulemaking prior to the release of the CY 2024 OPPS/ASC
proposed rule.
Proposed Remedy for the 340B-Acquired Drug Payment Policy for Calendar Years 2018-2022
Lump Sum Payments to Affected Providers for 340B-Acquired Drugs
In the proposed rule, CMS is proposing to make an additional payment to affected providers for 340B-acquired drugs as a one-time lump sum payment. CMS estimates that for CY 2018 through
the approximate third quarter of 2022, certain OPPS 340B providers received $10.5 billion less in 340B drug payments than they would have without the 340B policy. However, many CY 2022 340B drug claims have been processed, or reprocessed through standard claims
processing, at the higher default payment rate since the 340B payment policy was vacated on September 27, 2022. As a result, affected 340B providers have already received from Medicare and beneficiaries $1.5 billion of the $10.5 billion that would otherwise
have had to be remedied through these reprocessed claims. For the remaining $9 billion owed to affected 340B providers for claims covering CYs 2018 through 2022, CMS is proposing to make a one-time lump-sum payment to each 340B-covered entity hospital that
was paid less due to the now-invalidated policy. The proposed rule contains the calculations of the amounts owed to each of the approximately 1,600 affected 340B covered entity hospitals.
Beneficiary Copayments
Beneficiary copayments make up approximately 20% of the payments affected 340B covered entity hospitals did not receive due to the 340B payment policy. Because CMS plans to structure
the remedy as a lump-sum remedy payment, providers would not be able to bill beneficiaries for that cost sharing. To account for that fact and to ensure that affected 340B providers are put in as close to the same position as if the 340B payment policy had
never existed, Medicare proposes to account for beneficiary cost sharing within the one-time lump sum payment to affected hospitals. Under this proposal, affected 340B covered entity hospitals may not bill beneficiaries for coinsurance on remedy payments.
Prospective Offset for Higher Payments for Non-Drug Items and Services from CY 2018-2022
As part of this proposed remedy, CMS proposes to maintain budget neutrality as required by statute. As described above, CMS finalized the 340B policy for CY 2018 in 2017 in a budget neutral
manner that included increasing payments for non-drug items and services; this payment increase was in effect from CY 2018 through CY 2022. CMS estimates that hospitals were paid $7.8 billion more for non-drug items and services during this time period than
they would have been paid in the absence of the 340B payment policy. Because CMS is now making additional payments to affected 340B covered entity hospitals to pay them what they would have been paid had the 340B policy never been implemented, CMS proposes
to make a corresponding offset to maintain budget neutrality as if the 340B payment policy had never been in effect. To carry out this required $7.8 billion budget neutrality adjustment, CMS is proposing to reduce future non-drug item and service payments
by adjusting the OPPS conversion factor by minus 0.5% starting in CY 2025. CMS proposes to continue making this adjustment until the full $7.8 billion is offset, which CMS estimates to be 16 years.
Beneficiary copayments for non-drug items and services would decrease slightly in upcoming years as a result of the proposed prospective offset to the OPPS conversion factor.
New Providers
CMS is proposing that providers that did not enroll in Medicare until after January 1, 2018, and thus did not fully benefit from the increased payment for non-drug items and services
from CY 2018 through CY 2022, would be excluded from the prospective rate reduction.
###
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|